<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tools Don&#8217;t Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geekmanager.co.uk/2007/04/15/tools-dont-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geekmanager.co.uk/2007/04/15/tools-dont-matter/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldclimate</title>
		<link>http://blog.geekmanager.co.uk/2007/04/15/tools-dont-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-20359</link>
		<dc:creator>coldclimate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geekmanager.co.uk/2007/04/15/tools-dont-matter/#comment-20359</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I nearly agree.  Virtually no tool will solve your problems, but a good process will to.  However, the right tools to back that process (and it&#039;s nearly always a bunch of smaller tools so you get a better &quot;fit&quot; to the process) will make the process smoother, and more easily adopted, and this in turn will mean people have less incentive to ignore it/work round it.

&quot;convenience is better than better&quot;, and the right tools are very convenient, so convenient that you dont even think about using them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I nearly agree.  Virtually no tool will solve your problems, but a good process will to.  However, the right tools to back that process (and it&#8217;s nearly always a bunch of smaller tools so you get a better &#8220;fit&#8221; to the process) will make the process smoother, and more easily adopted, and this in turn will mean people have less incentive to ignore it/work round it.</p>
<p>&#8220;convenience is better than better&#8221;, and the right tools are very convenient, so convenient that you dont even think about using them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quo</title>
		<link>http://blog.geekmanager.co.uk/2007/04/15/tools-dont-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-4627</link>
		<dc:creator>Quo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geekmanager.co.uk/2007/04/15/tools-dont-matter/#comment-4627</guid>
		<description>Definitely agree people are what it&#039;s all about. 

Tools can make or break though, particularly in the case of remote working. (and sadly, I&#039;ve yet to find a simple &amp; fast web-based tool that suits our workflow)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely agree people are what it&#8217;s all about. </p>
<p>Tools can make or break though, particularly in the case of remote working. (and sadly, I&#8217;ve yet to find a simple &amp; fast web-based tool that suits our workflow)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://blog.geekmanager.co.uk/2007/04/15/tools-dont-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-2243</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geekmanager.co.uk/2007/04/15/tools-dont-matter/#comment-2243</guid>
		<description>The corollary to that, though, is that tools matter intensely...if they get in your way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The corollary to that, though, is that tools matter intensely&#8230;if they get in your way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://blog.geekmanager.co.uk/2007/04/15/tools-dont-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-2019</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 21:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geekmanager.co.uk/2007/04/15/tools-dont-matter/#comment-2019</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more. I think this stands for most knowledge endeavours as well. 

I think part of the reason is tools are quite personal, while processes by their nature are generally used by groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more. I think this stands for most knowledge endeavours as well. </p>
<p>I think part of the reason is tools are quite personal, while processes by their nature are generally used by groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

